Dominion Voting Systems announces that it has acquired the assets of Colorado-based Sequoia Voting Systems, with operations in “nearly 300 jurisdictions in 16 states.”
Dominion does not disclose the circumstances of the deal.
“As part of the transaction, Dominion has acquired Sequoia’s inventory and all intellectual property, including software, firmware and hardware, for Sequoia’s precinct and central count optical scan and DRE voting solutions, including BPS, WinEDS, Edge, Edge2, Advantage, insight, InsightPlus and 400C systems.”
The Edge 2 (AVC Edge II Plus) software is the same alleged threat software to which Rep. Maloney referred in her October, 2006 letter to the Department of the Treasury requesting a CFIUS investigation.
Source:
1. Dominionvoting.com/DominionAcquiresSequoiaFinal
1. Did Dominion acquire the Sequoia software source code (SAES Smartmatic source code) that the EU report of 2005 said is owned by the Venezuelan government?
2. What does Dominion mean here when it says it “has acquired Sequoia’s inventory and all intellectual property, including software, firmware and hardware, for Sequoia’s precinct and central count optical scan and DRE voting solutions, including BPS, WinEDS, Edge, Edge2, Advantage, insight, InsightPlus and 400C systems”?
3. Aren’t those Smartmatic technologies?
4. Who actually owns those technologies?
5. Does Smartmatic still have access to them in American-based voting machines?
6. How did Dominion, Sequoia, and Smartmatic clarify discrepancies in this Dominion statement?
7. Was Dominion aware of the “malicious” components (Edge, Edge2Plus, HAAT) that Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney saw as a danger to national security, and for which she sought a CFIUS review?
8. Are these malicious components, identified in 2005, still present in the electronic electoral systems for 2024?
Comments are closed.